0.03/0.11	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.03/0.12	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.12/0.33	% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
0.12/0.33	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.12/0.33	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.12/0.33	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPULimit   : 960
0.12/0.33	% WCLimit    : 120
0.12/0.33	% DateTime   : Tue Aug  9 03:00:33 EDT 2022
0.12/0.33	% CPUTime    : 
0.17/0.45	Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving
0.17/0.45	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.17/0.45	# Version: 3.0pre003-ho
0.17/0.45	eprover: eprover: Parsing a user given option argument: "(3.PNRefinedweight(PreferGoals,1,1,1,2,2,2,0.5),5.PNRefinedweight(PreferNonGoals,2,1,1,1,2,2,2),3.OrientLMaxWeight(PreferEasyHO,2,1,2,1,1),4.Diversityweight(DeferLambdas,1,1,1.5,1,1,-1.000000,0.000000,1.000000,1.000000)),1.FIFOWeight(ConstPrio),1.PNRefinedweight(PreferLambdas,2,1,1,1,2,2,2))":1:(Column 221):(just read ','): No token (probably EOF) expected, but Comma (',') read 
0.17/0.45	Parsing a user given option argument: "(3.PNRefinedweight(PreferGoals,1,1,1,2,2,2,0.5),5.PNRefinedweight(PreferNonGoals,2,1,1,1,2,2,2),3.OrientLMaxWeight(PreferEasyHO,2,1,2,1,1),4.Diversityweight(DeferLambdas,1,1,1.5,1,1,-1.000000,0.000000,1.000000,1.000000)),1.FIFOWeight(ConstPrio),1.PNRefinedweight(PreferLambdas,2,1,1,1,2,2,2))":1:(Column 221):(just read ','): No token (probably EOF) expected, but Comma (',') read 
0.17/0.45	eprover: Parsing a user given option argument: "(3.PNRefinedweight(PreferGoals,1,1,1,2,2,2,0.5),5.PNRefinedweight(PreferNonGoals,2,1,1,1,2,2,2),3.OrientLMaxWeight(PreferEasyHO,2,1,2,1,1),4.Diversityweight(DeferLambdas,1,1,1.5,1,1,-1.000000,0.000000,1.000000,1.000000)),1.FIFOWeight(ConstPrio),1.PNRefinedweight(PreferLambdas,2,1,1,1,2,2,2))":1:(Column 221):(just read ','): No token (probably EOF) expected, but Comma (',') read 
0.17/0.46	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
0.17/0.46	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.17/0.46	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 600s (5) cores
0.17/0.46	# Starting sh2lt with 120s (1) cores
0.17/0.46	# Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 120s (1) cores
0.17/0.46	# Starting post_as_ho10 with 120s (1) cores
0.17/0.46	# sh2lt with pid 25801 completed with status 0
0.17/0.46	# Result found by sh2lt
0.17/0.46	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
0.17/0.46	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.17/0.46	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 600s (5) cores
0.17/0.46	# Starting sh2lt with 120s (1) cores
0.17/0.46	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true)
0.17/0.46	# ...ProofStateSinE()=1/2
0.17/0.46	# Search class: HGHNF-FFSF00-SHHFFSBN
0.17/0.46	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.17/0.46	# Starting ehoh_best_nonlift with 65s (1) cores
0.17/0.46	# ehoh_best_nonlift with pid 25811 completed with status 0
0.17/0.46	# Result found by ehoh_best_nonlift
0.17/0.46	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
0.17/0.46	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.17/0.46	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 600s (5) cores
0.17/0.46	# Starting sh2lt with 120s (1) cores
0.17/0.46	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true)
0.17/0.46	# ...ProofStateSinE()=1/2
0.17/0.46	# Search class: HGHNF-FFSF00-SHHFFSBN
0.17/0.46	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.17/0.46	# Starting ehoh_best_nonlift with 65s (1) cores
0.17/0.46	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.17/0.46	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.17/0.46	
0.17/0.46	# Proof found!
0.17/0.46	# SZS status Theorem
0.17/0.46	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.17/0.46	thf(decl_22, type, cP: $o).
0.17/0.46	thf(decl_23, type, epred1_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.46	thf(decl_24, type, epred2_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.46	thf(decl_25, type, epred3_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.46	thf(decl_26, type, epred4_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.46	thf(decl_27, type, epred5_0: $i > $o).
0.17/0.46	thf(decl_28, type, epred6_0: $i > $o).
0.17/0.46	thf(decl_29, type, esk1_0: $i).
0.17/0.46	thf(decl_30, type, esk2_0: $i).
0.17/0.46	thf(cTHM120J_pme, conjecture, ?[X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((![X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o, X4:$i > $o]:((((X1 @ X2 @ X3)&(X1 @ X3 @ X4))=>(X1 @ X2 @ X4)))&![X2:$i > $o]:((X1 @ X2 @ X2)))&~((X1 @ (^[X5:$i]:(((cP)|~((cP))))) @ (^[X6:$i]:(((cP)&~((cP))))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cTHM120J_pme)).
0.17/0.46	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((![X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o, X4:$i > $o]:((((X1 @ X2 @ X3)&(X1 @ X3 @ X4))=>(X1 @ X2 @ X4)))&![X2:$i > $o]:((X1 @ X2 @ X2)))&~(X1 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(((cP)|~((cP))))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(((cP)&~((cP))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM120J_pme])])])).
0.17/0.46	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X12:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((((X12 @ (epred1_1 @ X12) @ (epred2_1 @ X12))|~(X12 @ (epred4_1 @ X12) @ (epred4_1 @ X12))|(X12 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(((cP)|~((cP))))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(((cP)&~((cP)))))))&((X12 @ (epred2_1 @ X12) @ (epred3_1 @ X12))|~(X12 @ (epred4_1 @ X12) @ (epred4_1 @ X12))|(X12 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(((cP)|~((cP))))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(((cP)&~((cP))))))))&(~(X12 @ (epred1_1 @ X12) @ (epred3_1 @ X12))|~(X12 @ (epred4_1 @ X12) @ (epred4_1 @ X12))|(X12 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(((cP)|~((cP))))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(((cP)&~((cP))))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])).
0.17/0.46	thf(c_0_3, plain, ![X18:$i]:(((epred6_0 @ X18)<=>((cP)&~((cP))))), introduced(definition)).
0.17/0.46	thf(c_0_4, plain, ![X17:$i]:(((epred5_0 @ X17)<=>((cP)|~((cP))))), introduced(definition)).
0.17/0.46	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred1_1 @ X1) @ (epred2_1 @ X1))|(((X1 @ epred5_0 @ epred6_0))=(($true)))|~((X1 @ (epred4_1 @ X1) @ (epred4_1 @ X1))))), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]), c_0_3]), c_0_4])).
0.17/0.46	thf(c_0_6, plain, ![X23:$i]:(((~(epred5_0 @ X23)|((cP)|~(cP)))&((~(cP)|(epred5_0 @ X23))&((cP)|(epred5_0 @ X23))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[])])])])).
0.17/0.46	thf(c_0_7, plain, ![X24:$i]:(((((cP)|~(epred6_0 @ X24))&(~(cP)|~(epred6_0 @ X24)))&(~(cP)|(cP)|(epred6_0 @ X24)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[])])])])).
0.17/0.46	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((((X1 @ epred5_0 @ epred6_0))=(($true)))|~((X1 @ (epred1_1 @ X1) @ (epred3_1 @ X1)))|~((X1 @ (epred4_1 @ X1) @ (epred4_1 @ X1))))), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]), c_0_3]), c_0_4])).
0.17/0.46	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred1_1 @ X1) @ (epred2_1 @ X1))|(X1 @ epred5_0 @ epred6_0)|~((X1 @ (epred4_1 @ X1) @ (epred4_1 @ X1))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.17/0.46	thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X5:$i]:(((epred5_0 @ X5)|~((cP)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.17/0.46	thf(c_0_11, plain, ![X5:$i]:(((cP)|(epred5_0 @ X5))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.17/0.46	thf(c_0_12, plain, ![X5:$i]:(((cP)|~((epred6_0 @ X5)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.17/0.46	thf(c_0_13, plain, ![X5:$i]:((~((cP))|~((epred6_0 @ X5)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.17/0.46	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ epred5_0 @ epred6_0)|~((X1 @ (epred1_1 @ X1) @ (epred3_1 @ X1)))|~((X1 @ (epred4_1 @ X1) @ (epred4_1 @ X1))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.17/0.46	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred2_1 @ X1) @ (epred3_1 @ X1))|(((X1 @ epred5_0 @ epred6_0))=(($true)))|~((X1 @ (epred4_1 @ X1) @ (epred4_1 @ X1))))), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]), c_0_3]), c_0_4])).
0.17/0.46	thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, (((epred2_1 @ $eq)=(epred1_1 @ $eq))|((epred6_0)=(epred5_0))), inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_9])).
0.17/0.46	thf(c_0_17, plain, ![X5:$i]:((epred5_0 @ X5)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])).
0.17/0.46	thf(c_0_18, plain, ![X5:$i]:(~((epred6_0 @ X5))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13])).
0.17/0.46	thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, (((epred6_0)=(epred5_0))|((epred3_1 @ $eq)!=(epred1_1 @ $eq))), inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_14])).
0.17/0.46	thf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred2_1 @ X1) @ (epred3_1 @ X1))|(X1 @ epred5_0 @ epred6_0)|~((X1 @ (epred4_1 @ X1) @ (epred4_1 @ X1))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])).
0.17/0.46	thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, ((epred2_1 @ $eq)=(epred1_1 @ $eq)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]), c_0_17]), c_0_18])).
0.17/0.46	thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, ((epred3_1 @ $eq)!=(epred1_1 @ $eq)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]), c_0_17]), c_0_18])).
0.17/0.46	thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, ((epred6_0)=(epred5_0)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_20]), c_0_21]), c_0_22])).
0.17/0.46	thf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]), c_0_17]), c_0_18]), ['proof']).
0.17/0.46	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.17/0.46	# Parsed axioms                        : 2
0.17/0.46	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 1
0.17/0.46	# Initial clauses                      : 9
0.17/0.46	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
0.17/0.46	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 7
0.17/0.46	# Processed clauses                    : 25
0.17/0.46	# ...of these trivial                  : 1
0.17/0.46	# ...subsumed                          : 1
0.17/0.46	# ...remaining for further processing  : 23
0.17/0.46	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.17/0.46	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.17/0.46	# Backward-subsumed                    : 4
0.17/0.46	# Backward-rewritten                   : 3
0.17/0.46	# Generated clauses                    : 49
0.17/0.46	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 37
0.17/0.46	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.17/0.46	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
0.17/0.46	# Paramodulations                      : 2
0.17/0.46	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.17/0.46	# NegExts                              : 2
0.17/0.46	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.17/0.46	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.17/0.46	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.17/0.46	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.17/0.46	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.17/0.46	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.17/0.46	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.17/0.46	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.17/0.46	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.17/0.46	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.17/0.46	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.17/0.46	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.17/0.46	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.17/0.46	# Current number of processed clauses  : 9
0.17/0.46	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
0.17/0.46	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.17/0.46	#    Negative unit clauses             : 2
0.17/0.46	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 4
0.17/0.46	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 21
0.17/0.46	# ...number of literals in the above   : 50
0.17/0.46	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.17/0.46	# Current number of archived clauses   : 14
0.17/0.46	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5
0.17/0.46	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
0.17/0.46	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2
0.17/0.46	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
0.17/0.46	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.17/0.46	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 4
0.17/0.46	# BW rewrite match successes           : 3
0.17/0.46	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.17/0.46	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.17/0.46	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 4598
0.17/0.46	
0.17/0.46	# -------------------------------------------------
0.17/0.46	# User time                : 0.006 s
0.17/0.46	# System time              : 0.001 s
0.17/0.46	# Total time               : 0.007 s
0.17/0.46	# Maximum resident set size: 1940 pages
0.17/0.46	
0.17/0.46	# -------------------------------------------------
0.17/0.46	# User time                : 0.007 s
0.17/0.46	# System time              : 0.002 s
0.17/0.46	# Total time               : 0.009 s
0.17/0.46	# Maximum resident set size: 1724 pages
0.17/0.46	EOF